Dellums Watch: Keeping Tabs on Oakland Mayor Ron Dellums

Because we care deeply about Oakland, we want Mayor Dellums to succeed. However, we strongly opposed his election because he never held a municipal position in Oakland and has lived in Washington for the last thirty-five years. We are wary of some of his supporters, and wish to keep a close eye on local political machinations. This blog will be focused on politics and people, not policy perscriptions (unlike FutureOakland).

September 05, 2006

Aimee Allison's Real Positions

Aimee Allison's slick, union-funded campaign flyers are vague in the extreme. For District 2 residents confused on her stands, here is some information.

Aimee Allison is part of the old Dellums crony network. Her fundraiser this week is hosted by Alameda County Supervisor Keith Carson and the city employees' union.

Aimee Allison thinks that Oakland, with about half the police per-capita of most mid-sized cities (let alone large cities), spends too much money on policing. The link is from an article she wrote in a magazine that speaks "for socialism." If she cuts millions of dollars from policing services, how are we supposed to have community policing? She emphasizes gun control, seemingly unaware that Oakland and Alameda County passed stringent gun control measures in the early 1990s, under leadership of then-Supervisor Don Perata.

Aimee Allison does not support a downtown main library (which is in District 2), because it shouldn't be "a priority."

Aimee Allison favors the lawsuit that seeks to stop Lake Merrit improvements (voter-approved Measure DD), because a few old trees will get lost in the process of expanding the lake.

Aimee Allison is an avowed socialist, happily accepting endorsements from several international socialist groups. Her government-directed vision of Oakland would result in the declining services and limited entrepreneurial opportunities we see in Berkeley.

Aimee Allison, as a good socialist, trusts bureaucracy over people's choices. She wants to close down nailshops on Grand Avenue, because they're "poor planning." No matter that they are patronized, of course - she knows better than District 2 consumers what shops should be on Grand.

Aimee Allison wants to seize Port revenues for the school district. Since all port "excess" revenue (the port's tiny profit is spent on debt service) goes toward expansion, this would mean reducing airport expansion and the current, and successful, effort to increase revenue growth through container terminal expansion. Her figure of adding $500 million to the city's biannual budget is ludicrously wrong.

Aimee Allison supports closing down charter schools for political, rather than education or financial, reasons.

Aimee Allison supports so-called "inclusionary" zoning, as the first item on her flyer. This is a fee levied on developers of high-density, transit-oriented housing, a fee that is not applied to developers of speculative mansions in the hills. In Oakland, the consumers of newly-built condos are first-time homebuyers who are mainly seeking to live close to Chinatown (a part of District 2). Ms. Allison is looking to impose huge fees on first-time, transit-oriented homeowners in Chinatown. Ironically, the fees do not go to provide low-income housing, but instead support vaguely-defined "affordable" housing, which may go to households earning as much as $100,000 a year.

Aimee Allison opposes the Oak-to-Ninth project, although I cannot find a single detail of her specific criticism of it. She has taken no position on the school board land sale. She seems to think that electing her will lead to the end of the war in Iraq. She thinks that Oakland having all-black political leadership is "so great," even though it's a multiracial city. This is one nutty chick. Unfortunately, between her non-Oakland-based Green Party support, and the deep pockets of Dellums' cronies (remember, Dellums not only violated the spending pledge but also far outspent De La Fuente), she will be able to put up a very tough fight against incumbent Kernighan. Hopefully District 2 voters will look past the hype and re-elect their effective, moderate councilwoman.




Aimee Allison's endorsements are here. Notable endorsements:

The Dellums Machine: Dan Seigel, Greg Hodge, Keith Carson, Geoffrey Peete

The city employees' union (and the statewide unions that control the Democratic Party, like the nurses and teachers' unions, that donate huge sums to Don Perata). So much for an independent third party!

The Berkeley City Council's anti-growth, anti-transit, anti-youth, anti-business "progressive" wing: Kriss Worthington, Dona Spring, and candidate Chris Cavanaugh

San Francisco socialists: Chris Daly, Matt Gonzalez, Ross Mirkarimi

technorati tags start Technorati Tags: oakland, oakland mayor, oakland politics, politics, aimee allison, Green Party technorati tags end

17 Comments:

At September 05, 2006 6:12 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

You are well intentioned but ignorant. Aimee Allison is a visionary what we need in Oakland to battle the developer--white invasion that is currently beset us. I am Irish so I can say there is a white invasion currently at hand in Oakland. Oakland is a unique American city in so many ways. Us whiteys already dominate so many unique American "progressive" cities that are "livable" (relatively compared to progressive cities that are not) such as SF, Portland, Seattle, NY. The Black, Brown, and Yellow communities of Oakland is part of what makes Oakland Oakland. If you do not like the real Oakland Mr "Native" pack up and move to Tracy.

Jimmy McSwean

 
At September 06, 2006 9:55 AM, Blogger Oakland Native said...

She's a visionary? I shudder at her "vision" of shuttered stiores, a shrunken port, and politicized educational facilities. Oakland does not need to "battle" developers (although, yes, that is probably what Ms. Allison thinks), but needs to welcome new residents and continue to increase its tax base so that we don't have to cut services like Head Start to keep paying the city employees huge pensions.

The typical condo buyer in Oakland is not white, but Asian. Virtually every condo built in Oakland costs less than the median price of an existing home. So, it's not "gentrification" that's happening, but simply responses to demand from people to live in Oakland's uniquely inclusive culture. Ms. Allison's narrow, race-based call for "an alignment" of "black progressive leadership" is just as excluding to brown and yellow people as it is to white people. Her explicit promise to vote in lockstep with Dellums and her acceptance of the city employees' union money means she will be far from an "independent voice." Ms. Allison is a carpetbagger who is attempting to use lies, trickery and ideology to grab political power and exercise it to the detriment of entrepreneurs, charter school students, and first-time homeowners.

Deckin, thanks for your comments, on the important issue of education (on which our council has little to no say, though is stressed by the left). It's true that Aimee Allison's extremist ideology is just as closed-minded as the Bushies in DC, and would be just as disastrous. She has no concrete policy positions or means of solving any problems, and her positions stem from ideology and not reality (for example, Oakalnd's unemployment rate is quite low, and continuing to fall). I am worried, however, that her coming defeat in November will not be the last of her - there's an at-large election coming up in 2 years, and Councilmember Chang is by far the most conservatie member of the council.

 
At September 06, 2006 4:33 PM, Blogger Oakland Native said...

Well, the black nationalists are out in force at the moment - did you read The Express's ridiculous article condemning the Art Murmur (of all things) for being too young and too white? I look forward to Mayor Dellums bringing people together on these issues.

Check out the state Green party's economic platform - it is downright scary. They want to abolish the Federal Reserve, impose capital controls on business to "keep money local," exempt non-profits from all regulation, and, of course, shut down nail shops.

 
At September 07, 2006 4:12 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Most of Aimee's problems are outlined well in this article and the comments. What needs to happen, though, is that people need to help Pat win. Hopefully, you folks will do that.

One way to do this from an information perspective is to find statements from candidates and see if they have followed through. For example, in her comments from the Lakeview meeting, Aimee says that the new main library is not a good idea (I agree, it's not), but then she also says "I look forward to attending the next Life Enrichment committee."

Well, did she? I doubt it. Pointing that out is something that matters to voters. Aimee is extremely political, and doesn;t mind going to meetings and schmoozing. But doing something? I don;t think anyone can point to a thing she's done in the year plus that she's been running.

Those type of things matter to voters who aren't, say, just red/green bashing, like you are here (c'mon, be honest!) I mean, Aimee's even a bad socialist!

Signed,
Progressive, but Anti-Allison

 
At September 07, 2006 8:19 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Deckin:

Amen to all you wrote.

And she'll drop her 8 year old son when needed, but won;t mention he's in private school.

Oh, and i understand her partner's a real estate agent. Are they really hating gentrification when it's putting the freakin bread on the table?

 
At September 11, 2006 12:15 PM, Blogger Oakland Native said...

Aimee Allison's son goes to private school?! That's scandalous! No wonder she opposes charter schools. Her partner's real estate job just illustrates the hypocrisy behind anti-gentrification measures: a massive condo tax would inflate the values all existing homes. But I'd rather focus on the issues.

There is quite a buzz around District 2 that Ms. Allison doesn't attend community meetings. That would probably explain why anti-development firebrand Pamela Drake is endorsing Pat. While personally I'd rather see an agressively pro-growth Chinatown-Grand Lake councilmember (Pat doesn't support the school board land sale, for example), I respect Pat's moderate, bridge-building approach. Also, she gets results - she brought walking officers back to her district! Quite an accomplishment.

 
At September 12, 2006 9:32 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Oh, and she drives a custom Audi and her husband drives an SUV.

And we've alreayd talked about her Stanford education.

Has anyone actually tried to find out what her "business" is or how to do business with her (she describes herself on the ballot as "businesswoman")? Has anyone even checked to see if she has a business license with the City?

 
At September 13, 2006 1:40 PM, Blogger Oakland Native said...

I don't like to be so personally critical of political candidates (PK drives a minivan), but Ms. Allison really brings this on herself with her ideological tirades that are very critical of her imagined political opponents. She thinks Pat Kernighan is the same as Bush - she basically said that in the MP3 interview (she says that, to stop the Bush way of thinking, she needed to run for City Council).

I think she is a consultant to non-profits. She's also written a moderately successful book. It is very true that her campaign is not focused on District 2 but on ideological posturing. That's why she's going to lose. But if PK's margin isn't huge, Aimee Allison is back for sure.

 
At September 13, 2006 5:41 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Personal attacks aren't the best way, but they're revealing (Pat isn't saying she's some greenie superstar). At the very least, her hypocrisy gives some insight into her values and judgement.

After she spent her last campaign going on and on about the Council bending over for "out of town developers," her first public action is to appear at the City Council and advocate for a no-bid/no performance standards ENA for the Wayan Brothers (from LA, if you didn;t know).

Hopefully, if she loses, she'll give it a rest. I don;t know if you can fail to win three times in two years and argue that you've got it going on. Inevitably, I say she goes Rebecca Kaplan: AC Transit, BART, EBMUD Board or something, to do some favors for some people and unions, racking up some political capital and waiting in the cut for an opening.

 
At September 14, 2006 1:21 PM, Blogger Oakland Native said...

Good point about the Wayans Brother ENA. I guess she only objects to developers who are building much-needed middle-income housing, but amusement parks are great. I strongly support the Wayans Brothers idea (and I love Scary Movie!), but the buzz around City Hall is that it's not going to happen.

The fact that the AC Transit board is stuffed with political wannabes probably explains why the most efficient transit system in the Bay Area regularly gets stiffed by the politicians who control the state and federal budgets. Why didn't Rebecca Kaplan (who lives in Temescal) object to the proposed Telegraph Avenue development moratorium? If Larry Reid hadn't killed it, AC Transit's forthcoming Rapid Bus Service would have been screwed.

 
At November 06, 2006 1:36 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Your anti-socialist ranting is just annoying. If you have a political point against socialism, than make it! Calling something socialist in and of itself is not valid argument against it.

 
At November 07, 2006 12:35 AM, Blogger Oakland Native said...

I don't think that, in a rational discussion with educated people, I need to explain that socialism doesn't work. Europe has been struggling for decades to rid itself of its socialist legacy, which has caused economic and cultural stagnation as well as alienated youth with limited opportunities. To see the fallacy of these ideas, we just need to look next door to San Francisco, whose socialist housing policies make homes unbelievably expensive; or to Berkeley, whose Zoning Adjustments Board has ruined their commercial districts.

 
At May 12, 2010 2:34 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

zygor guides -
37 days to clean credit -
advanced defrag -
adware alert -
adware bot -
affiliate prophet -
affiliate video brander -
anti spyware -
art of approaching -
atomic blogging -
auction classified cash -
automated cash formula -
bbq book -
bloggers pay check -
blogging in action -
body building revealed -
burnthefat -
burn the fat -
carb rotation diet -
cheat your way thin -
chopper tattoo -
cleanup the profits -
cold sore freedom in 3 days -
commission blueprint -
conversationalhypnosis -
conversational hypnosis -
cure for bruxism -
declutter fast -
driver checker -
earth4energy -
earth 4 energy -
easy member pro -
easy tv soft -
eatstopeat -

 
At July 25, 2015 8:32 PM, Blogger 三重古天樂 said...

酒店經紀 酒店打工 酒店工作 酒店上班 酒店兼差 酒店兼職 打工兼差 打工兼職 台北酒店 酒店應徵 禮服店 酒店 經紀 打工 兼差便服店 酒店時間 酒店薪水 酒店經紀公司 酒店內容 美式餐廳 咖啡廳

 
At January 14, 2020 3:03 PM, Blogger 梁爵 said...

2020.01.15酒店工作環境與酒店小姐酒店兼差滿意度息息相關,根據知名酒店經紀調查顯示,2019整體酒店上班感到滿意的比率為74.3%,而近一年中有加班者占48.3%,平均每月加班17.9小時。為了解在八大行業就業酒店打工的工作狀況、對工作環境滿意度及職涯規劃等情形,酒店經紀公司辦理「制服店、便服店、禮服店、鋼琴酒吧、日式酒店、飯局、傳播就業狀況調查」,以大學生/上班族/單親媽媽設定調查對象,總計回收有效酒店兼職樣本5000份,並於今天公布調查結果。酒店經紀調查顯示,2019年酒店小姐對整體酒店工作感到滿意的比率為76.3%,較去年上升0.4個百分點,感到不滿意者則占2.4%。其中,對整體感到滿意者,以性別工作平等、同事間的相處與友誼滿意比率都逾9成6最高,其次為行政對公關的關切與照顧占96.8%;而不滿意者中,以明配(性交易)不滿意比率占76.7%居首,其次為酒店工作負荷量占68.0%。

 
At April 10, 2020 12:15 PM, Blogger 梁爵 said...

2020.04.11台北市酒店工作酒店小姐潔西(花名)確診武漢肺炎(COVID-19、新冠肺炎)的酒店女公關(案379),疫情中心在8日記者會中說她「生活單純、沒工作」,但昨(9)日卻說要從酒店上班職場進行疫調,後來才知道,前後說法不一全是因為女公關有「酒店打工難言之隱」,她在酒店上班,丈夫、家人全不知情,一開始還懇求疫調人員不要將她酒店PT身分曝光。
原本飲酒作樂、狂歡消遣的酒店、舞廳不敵疫情,全面停業,全因出現八大行業首例酒店員工確診。案379至今找不到感染源,後來爆出是酒店女公關,她在4月3日發病,以為是抽電子菸引起胸悶,繼續上班,4日就醫收治隔離,8日確診。但8日的疫情中心記者會,說她生活單純、沒工作;9日卻改口,疫調要從職場著手調查。
疫情中心指揮官陳時中(2020.04.09):「我們的疫調人員覺得不太相信這樣的講法,發覺確有難言之隱。」
疫調資料顯示,這名女公關(案379)年約30多歲,住桃園,因為經濟因素,天天台北桃園來回到酒店工作,而對於工作內容,丈夫、家人全然不知情,她確診後又精神狀況不穩,疫調細節有難言之隱。
傳出女公關更懇求防疫醫師不要將她曝光,但調閱近日上檯記錄,發現她一週上班3天,分屬3間酒店,每天接觸至少超過50人,還曾有被帶出場的紀錄,一週接觸超過至少150人。
醫療界分析:「(酒店)譬如說用餐,或者聊天講話、用飲料,當然是比較容易感染,禁絕這些用餐的行為,或者是說在一起講話的行為,你表面上禁止,但是有可能會轉向地下化。」
國內醫師有擔憂,但推行八大行業場所「實名制」算是折衷之道,一旦出現確診或疑似個案,能立即追蹤、降低疫調難度。

 
At October 02, 2020 11:01 AM, Blogger 梁爵 said...

2020.10.03【酒店小姐】【酒店公關】不敢來酒店上班-酒店打工的原因其實很多人~對酒店有些不了解與誤會~以為酒店小姐的基本介紹跟工作內容會去酒店上班的女生是愛慕虛榮,其實就我們多年經驗,會入行真的都是有旁大的經濟壓力。酒店小姐酒店公關酒店上班到底都在做麼?酒店也許不是最佳的選擇 卻是賺錢最快的方式之一 (有頭髮誰願意當禿子!!)為什麼呢!!!
因為去喝酒的人有千百種理由~有開心的人/有難過的人~
以下是我們家姐妹的想法:
當她遇到心情不好的客人時~【她會靜靜的聽客人發牢騷】適時的給予安慰與溫暖的笑容(做好桌面清潔服務)當客人喝多了:她會要一杯熱茶給客人~提醒他喝多了~
若遇到開心的客人~她會感染那一份快樂與喜悅~,真心的祝福那個人~
其實說穿她就是做客人的專屬服務生罷了~
她只是付出了她的關懷體貼跟細心跟桌邊服務,其實就達到8成了。
每個人的生長背景環境不同所選擇的生活方式也有不同 沒有什麼對錯~
當別人批評妳的工作時,除了批評以外真的對妳沒有任何實質幫助 妳還是得面對自己的困難和人生啊!!

 

Post a Comment

<< Home